1. Map the red zones
Shareholder current accounts, management fees, intra-group agreements, VAT on mixed activities, international matters, real estate wealth tax (IFI): the areas an auditor examines first. The map precedes the remedy.
The tax authorities no longer audit at random: they target through data analysis based on information already reported. For a structured company or significant personal assets, the question is no longer whether but when. A risk anticipated does not cost the same as a risk endured. This guide explains how a tax audit is prepared, and why that preparation is best handled by a lawyer.
The French tax administration (DGFiP) now selects a major share of its audits through data analysis, an automated cross-referencing of the information the taxpayer has themselves reported: the accounting-entries file, statutory tax filings, income and wealth returns, and data from the international exchange of information. Inconsistency can no longer be hidden: it is computed.
The corollary is simple. What the tax authorities can compute, the taxpayer can compute before them. And the cost gap between the two situations is considerable: a risk corrected voluntarily bears late-payment interest reduced by half (French Tax Code art. 1727 V) and no surcharge; the same risk discovered by an auditor comes with a 40% surcharge, sometimes 80% (French Tax Code art. 1729), and interest at the full rate.
Preparing for a tax audit is therefore not about hoping to escape it. It is about knowing your exposure early enough to address it under the most favourable conditions the law provides: voluntary correction, the express mention (French Tax Code art. 1727 II), preventive documentation, the advance ruling.
Preparing for a tax audit means acting on five fronts before the tax authorities take it up.
Shareholder current accounts, management fees, intra-group agreements, VAT on mixed activities, international matters, real estate wealth tax (IFI): the areas an auditor examines first. The map precedes the remedy.
Every weakness must be quantified and tied to its legal basis: Tax Code, official tax guidelines (BOFiP), case law. A vague point of attention supports no decision.
Amended returns, interest reduced by half (French Tax Code art. 1727 V), no surcharge. The arithmetic is decisive against a reassessment endured.
Written and dated agreements, a remuneration policy, documented transfer pricing, an advance ruling on uncertain points: turning a grey area into an unassailable position.
The report listing your weaknesses, if conducted by a lawyer, is covered by professional secrecy: the tax authorities cannot require its disclosure. An audit conducted by a third party, by contrast, leaves a record that can be used against you.
The firm defends taxpayers facing the DGFiP: companies, directors, high-net-worth individuals. This litigation practice feeds one conviction: most heavy reassessments are decided before the audit, in the quality of the case preparation.
That is why the firm designed The Mock Audit: a full simulation of a tax audit, run on your file with the same lines of inquiry, the same texts and the same figures as an auditor, ahead of the tax authorities. The report, covered by professional secrecy, lists the quantified heads of reassessment and the prioritised action plan to neutralise them.
Yes. Since the tax authorities target on data already reported, that same data can be analysed upstream, along the same lines as an auditor. This is the purpose of a tax-audit simulation: knowing your exposure before it is discovered.
Clearly. Voluntary correction gives entitlement to a 50% reduction in late-payment interest (French Tax Code art. 1727 V) and avoids any surcharge. The same risk discovered during an audit, by contrast, bears a 40% surcharge, or even 80% in the event of manoeuvres (French Tax Code art. 1729).
For professional secrecy (Act of 31 December 1971, art. 66-5). The report listing your weaknesses, conducted by a lawyer, is covered by secrecy: it cannot be seized, save for the case, foreign to a preventive audit, of a document used to commit fraud (French Code of Criminal Procedure art. 56-1-2). Conducted by a third party, it may on the contrary be disclosed or seized: you would then have created yourself the very document liable to be used against you.
The ordinary statute of limitations is three years for income tax and corporate tax (French Book of Tax Procedures art. L.169). It is extended to ten years notably for hidden activities, undeclared foreign assets or, since the 2025 Finance Act, false tax residency abroad. Wealth tax (IFI) and registration duties are subject to a separate six-year period (art. L.186).
With a quantified mapping of your red zones. For this the firm offers The Mock Audit, a tax-audit simulation conducted by a lawyer and presented in a meeting. A preliminary consultation allows its relevance to be assessed.
The anticipation service and resources related to tax audits.
A tax-audit simulation conducted by a lawyer, ahead of the tax authorities: a quantified report, covered by professional secrecy.
Voir la page Litigation hubProcedure, avenues of appeal, defence strategy in the face of an adjustment notice.
Voir la page ProceduresDesk audit, accounts audit, personal tax-situation review, examination of accounts: four procedures.
Voir la page Voluntary stepAccounts, trusts, life insurance: voluntary correction ahead of an audit.
Voir la pageThe Mock Audit: a tax-audit simulation conducted by a lawyer, under the protection of professional secrecy. The firm accepts a limited number of matters each month.
© BENSAID Avocats — The information on this site does not constitute legal advice and cannot replace a personalised analysis. Sources: French Tax Code art. 1727 (late-payment interest; II express mention; V voluntary correction), art. 1729 (surcharges); French Book of Tax Procedures art. L.169 and L.186 (statute of limitations); Act no. 71-1130 of 31 December 1971, art. 66-5 (professional secrecy); French Code of Criminal Procedure art. 56-1-2. Editorial update: July 2026.