Fiducie spoke — Real-estate fiducie vs SCI comparison

Real-estate fiducie vs SCI:
which wealth tool?

Q: Does a real-estate fiducie give rise to transfer duties?

On creation of the fiducie, the transfer of a building from the settlor to the fiduciary gives rise to a fixed registration duty of €125 (French Tax Code art. 635, 8°), not the classic transfer duties. On unwinding of the fiducie, the return of the assets to the settlor (who is also the beneficiary) is likewise subject to the fixed duty. This is a major advantage vs a sale-and-leaseback (which would trigger transfer duties of 6.32% in 2026, a rate applicable to deeds executed and agreements concluded until 31 March 2028).

Q: Can the fiducie serve to protect a spouse undergoing divorce proceedings?

With caution and anticipation. A fiducie granted in full knowledge of an imminent risk may be challenged on the ground of the Paulian action (Civil Code art. 1341-2). For it to be enforceable against the spouse, the following are required: (a) a fiducie granted before the divorce proceedings or at the start of an amicable separation, (b) a clear economic consideration (no gratuitous fiducie, prohibited by Civil Code art. 2013), (c) a professional justification (a financial guarantee, restructuring). Analysis with a family-law lawyer is essential.

The SCI (société civile immobilière, Civil Code art. 1832 et seq.) remains the most widespread real-estate structuring tool in France: tax transparency (French Tax Code art. 8), statutory flexibility, gradual transfer through the split of ownership rights. The real-estate fiducie (Civil Code art. 2011 to 2030) proposes a different logic: transfer of ownership to the fiduciary, asset segregation, enforceability erga omnes. This spoke compares the two tools across 5 operational dimensions: asset protection, financing, taxation, transfer, governance.

Discuss a transaction Back to the Fiducie hub

Paris · Geneva · Marseille · Cannes · Lisbon

— In brief

SCI — governing text: Civil Code art. 1832 et seq. + French Tax Code art. 8 (transparency)
Fiducie — governing text: Civil Code art. 2011 to 2030 + Law of 19 February 2007
SCI — strength: Statutory flexibility + transfer through the split of ownership rights
Fiducie — strength: Asset segregation + enforceability erga omnes
Choice by objective: Family wealth: SCI; Financing security / restructuring: fiducie

— The answer

Fiducie or SCI: the answer fits in three questions

Are you looking to pass wealth on? Then the SCI, or another route of gift and inheritance law: the fiducie does not transmit. Article 2013 of the Civil Code strikes with public-policy nullity any fiducie agreement proceeding from a donative intent.

Are you looking to protect an asset or secure a financing? Then the fiducie: the SCI is only a screen, its shares remain attachable; the fiducie takes the property out of the estate and puts it beyond the reach of the creditors of the settlor and of the fiduciary alike.

Are you looking to organise joint ownership, over time, at low cost? Then the SCI, which is exactly what it is for. And when the objectives combine, the two tools combine as well: the shares of an SCI can themselves be placed in a fiducie.

— The comparison

Fiducie and SCI, point by point

Criterion	Fiducie	SCI
Nature	A contract (C. civ. art. 2011 to 2030)	A company (C. civ. art. 1832 et seq.)
Who holds the property	The fiduciary, in a separate estate; a role reserved by art. 2015 (financial institutions and lawyers)	The SCI itself; the partners hold shares
Duration	99 years at most (art. 2018, 2°)	99 years, renewable
Formalities at birth	Six particulars and registration within one month on pain of nullity (art. 2018 and 2019), land registration for real estate	Articles of association and registration; great freedom afterwards
Against creditors	An estate separated by statute: the assets no longer answer for the settlor’s debts	A relative screen: the shares remain attachable and each partner answers indefinitely for the company’s debts in proportion to his stake
Gratuitous transmission	Impossible: the donative fiducie is void as a matter of public policy (art. 2013)	Its home ground: gifts of shares, split ownership, renewable allowances
In insolvency proceedings	A very robust security, but enforcement is frozen if the settlor keeps the use of the asset (C. com. art. L. 622-23-1)	No particular protection: shares and claims follow the ordinary rules

Two lines of this table decide most matters. Transmission, where the fiducie is disqualified from the outset by article 2013. And protection, where it is the SCI that fails to deliver: people often believe the property is sheltered because it sits in the company, when the shares themselves remain in the partner's estate, within reach of his creditors.

— 01

Complementary tools, not competitors

The question is not "SCI or fiducie", but "SCI and/or fiducie". The two tools address distinct issues. The SCI is the classic wealth tool to hold, manage and transfer real-estate assets within a family: it excels at gradual transfer (gift of shares with a split of ownership rights), the organisation of joint ownership, and income-tax treatment (French Tax Code art. 8 transparency). The fiducie is a tool of protection and security: it excels whenever there is a need to segregate assets (creditors, restructuring, divorce, inheritance dispute) or to grant them as security to a financier.

Our conviction: for significant assets (> €5M) or in an international context, the SCI + fiducie combination is often superior to either tool taken in isolation. Examples: a family SCI whose shares are placed in a fiducie as security for bank financing; a real-estate fiducie protecting buildings while preserving tax transparency through the beneficiary status conferred on the settlor.

The choice depends on the gradation of objectives: protection against what (creditors, former spouse, heirs, tax authorities), desired governance (unanimous vote, qualified majorities, delegated management), time horizon (fiducie limited to 99 years by Civil Code art. 2018-2 vs SCI with no statutory limit), jurisdiction (the fiducie is little known outside France; the SCI is universally understood).

— 03

Case study handled by the firm

Family real-estate holding of €25M — combined SCI + fiducie architecture

A family real-estate holding owning 9 buildings (value €25M), historically structured as an income-tax SCI. The issues: (a) €8M of bank financing to acquire a new building, (b) protection against the spouse risk of one of the majority members undergoing divorce proceedings, (c) gradual transfer to the children. Our architecture: (1) the SCI remains the holding structure for tax transparency and transfer, (2) a security fiducie over the 4 main buildings for the benefit of the bank pool to secure the €8M financing, (3) a protection fiducie over the shares of the member undergoing divorce, segregating the shares from the matrimonial regime during the proceedings, (4) a scheduled gift of shares with a split of ownership rights to the children in parallel. Total set-up cost: around €95K. Advantages: financing obtained on premium terms, reinforced asset protection, gradual transfer maintained.

— 02

Comparison across 5 operational dimensions

1. Asset protection

SCI: ownership sits within the SCI; the members hold shares. A seizure of a member's shares is possible (though often complicated by statutory approval clauses). A member's personal creditors may seek a partition. Fiducie: ownership sits with the fiduciary, in a distinct segregated pool of assets (Civil Code art. 2024). The fiducie assets cannot be seized by the settlor's personal creditors. A clear advantage to the fiducie for protection.

2. Financing and security

SCI: a pledge of shares is possible (and frequent), but the pledge remains exposed to conflicts with other creditors and to suspect-period nullities. Security fiducie: transfer of ownership, enforceability erga omnes, simplified contractual realisation. A clear advantage to the fiducie for structured-financing transactions or in a restructuring context.

3. Taxation (income tax / corporate tax)

Income-tax SCI: tax transparency (French Tax Code art. 8), rental income is taxed directly in the members' hands according to their share. A corporate-tax SCI is possible by election (French Tax Code art. 206, 3) with depreciation of the buildings. Fiducie: tax neutrality (French Tax Code 238 quater A to I) where the settlor is designated as beneficiary, the income remains taxed in the settlor's hands as if the assets were held directly. A regime equivalent to the income-tax SCI on this point.

4. Transfer

SCI: the wealth-transfer tool par excellence. The gift of shares with a split of ownership rights (bare ownership to the children, usufruct retained) with the French Tax Code 779 allowance (€100K per parent per child every 15 years) is the classic mechanism. A customary discount applies for a blocking minority and illiquidity. Fiducie: transfer through a gratuitous fiducie was restricted by the 2009 law (prohibition of the gratuitous fiducie, Civil Code art. 2013). The fiducie remains useful ahead of a transfer to segregate assets before a gift.

5. Governance

SCI: flexible governance through the articles: sole or collegial manager, qualified majorities, pre-emption rights, approval right on a transfer of shares. Fiducie: governance defined in the contract, with a fiduciary who exercises the rights attached to the assets, framed by an agreement making the assets available to the settlor. More rigid than an SCI but more protective in the event of a dispute.

— Frequently asked questions

Can an SCI be converted into a fiducie?

Not directly (the SCI is a legal entity, the fiducie a contract). But one can place the SCI's buildings or shares in a fiducie for the benefit of a fiduciary. The SCI remains a legal entity; it is the assets (buildings or shares) that pass into the fiducie. The operation is generally tax-neutral where it complies with the conditions of art. 238 quater A to I of the French Tax Code.

Does a real-estate fiducie give rise to transfer duties?

On creation of the fiducie, the transfer of a building from the settlor to the fiduciary gives rise to a fixed registration duty of €125 (French Tax Code art. 635, 8°), not the classic transfer duties. On unwinding of the fiducie, the return of the assets to the settlor (who is also the beneficiary) is likewise subject to the fixed duty. This is a major advantage vs a sale-and-leaseback (which would trigger transfer duties of 6.32% in 2026, a rate applicable to deeds executed and agreements concluded until 31 March 2028).

What about the IFI?

The IFI (French Tax Code art. 964 et seq.) applies to French real estate whatever the mode of holding (direct, SCI, fiducie). For an income-tax SCI, the members declare the value of the shares pro rata. For a fiducie, it is the settlor designated as beneficiary who declares the value of the fiducie assets (French Tax Code art. 970, 2°). There is no IFI advantage in using one or the other. The structuring can be optimised through deductible debt and discounts depending on the nature of the assets.

Can the fiducie serve to protect a spouse undergoing divorce proceedings?

With caution and anticipation. A fiducie granted in full knowledge of an imminent risk may be challenged on the ground of the Paulian action (Civil Code art. 1341-2). For it to be enforceable against the spouse, the following are required: (a) a fiducie granted before the divorce proceedings or at the start of an amicable separation, (b) a clear economic consideration (no gratuitous fiducie, prohibited by Civil Code art. 2013), (c) a professional justification (a financial guarantee, restructuring). Analysis with a family-law lawyer is essential.

Cité par

— See also

Hub

Fiducie

Main hub.

Voir la page Spoke