— 03
Bensaid's support for a France → Italy transfer
The firm structures transfer operations towards the article 24-bis regime in a four-stage sequence. First, the pre-departure analysis: mapping of the assets (real estate, financial, professional), characterisation of the expected foreign income, simulation of the total cost over fifteen years, identification of the qualified shareholdings subject to the five-year exclusion, computation of the exit tax within the meaning of article 167 bis of the French Tax Code (applicable above EUR 800,000 of substantial shareholdings or 50% of rights in the profits).
Second, securing the Italian side through a local partner — avvocato tributarista and commercialista in Milan or Rome — to prepare the interpello with the Agenzia delle Entrate, document the absence of Italian residence over the reference decade, and calibrate any list of countries excluded from the lump sum. The firm coordinates the process to ensure consistency between the Italian filing position and the French exit filings.
Third, the exit-tax audit and French exit: form no. 2074-ETD, choice between immediate payment and payment deferral (as of right for a transfer to an EU Member State, which Italy is), any guarantees, timetable of eventual relief (relief of the tax on unrealised gains after two years of holding, five years where the overall value of the securities exceeds EUR 2.57 million). Fourth, the transfer timetable: date of switch of civil residence, removal from the French register of French nationals abroad, registration with the competent Italian consulate, effective transfer of the permanent home within the meaning of article 4 of the France-Italy treaty of 5 October 1989.
The firm's doctrine is that of verifiable consistency: a transfer is solid only if each of its markers — civil, social, economic, real-estate, family — converges towards the new jurisdiction. A 24-bis election activated without an effective switch exposes the taxpayer to a re-characterisation as dual residence, resolved by the tie-breaker rules of article 4 of the treaty, with a return to worldwide taxation in France and a criminal risk on the ground of tax fraud (art. 1741 of the French Tax Code).