Authorise or prohibit
Restating the right forestalls any argument about a contrary intention; a spouse who wants the other to take all or nothing may prohibit it.
Under French law, a surviving spouse who benefits from a gift between spouses (donation au dernier vivant), or a legatee named in a will, may decide to take only part of what the deceased left them. The rest passes to the other successors as if it came directly from the deceased, without being treated as a gift by the beneficiary. Prepared in the deceased’s will or gift, this choice is particularly protective of blended families.
It is the right of the beneficiary of a gift or legacy taking effect on death to limit what they receive to part of the assets the deceased gave them. It belongs to a legatee, provided at least one statutory heir has accepted the estate (French Civil Code, art. 1002-1), and to a surviving spouse benefiting from a gift between spouses where the deceased left children or descendants (art. 1094-1, para. 2), in both cases unless the deceased provided otherwise.
The assets given up are not a gift by the beneficiary: for tax purposes they are deemed transferred by the deceased (French Tax Code, art. 788 bis). The beneficiary is taxed only on what they keep, and the heirs on what they receive, according to their relationship with the deceased.
Civil Code, art. 1002-1; art. 1094-1; Tax Code, art. 788 bis; BOI-ENR-DMTG-10-20-50-30 (in French). Checked on 5 November 2026.
Version in force on 5 November 2026.
Accept, then limit. Cantonnement presupposes that the entitlement has been accepted, the acceptance being “accompanied or followed” by the choice to benefit from only part of it (BOI-ENR-DMTG-10-20-50-30, § 1). A beneficiary who disclaims can no longer limit.
In the same deed as the option. The firm recommends recording in a single notarial deed the acceptance, the spouse’s choice between the portions of article 1094-1, and the list of assets or rights kept. A poorly drafted option may amount to an irrevocable cantonnement that a later deed cannot correct (Paris Court of Appeal, 1 October 2025, below).
Timing. The law sets no specific deadline for cantonnement. The time limits governing an heir’s option do not apply to it directly but give benchmarks: an heir who has not decided within ten years is deemed to have disclaimed (art. 780); an heir may be formally required to decide after four months and then has two months (art. 771 and 772). As a rule, the inheritance tax return is due within six months of a death in metropolitan France, subject to special time limits (Tax Code, art. 641): that provision sets no deadline for the validity of cantonnement, but it is better to settle and document it before filing, so that the tax is assessed correctly.
Specific conditions. For a legatee, a statutory heir must have accepted the estate, otherwise no one takes the part given up. For a spouse, article 1094-1 presupposes descendants: without them, the Toulouse Court of Appeal ruled out cantonnement based on that provision and upheld taxation at 60% (below). A spouse named as legatee may then, where appropriate, rely on article 1002-1, if a statutory heir has accepted the estate.
Questioned by two members of Parliament, the Minister of Justice answered in identical terms, quoting the circular of 29 May 2007: cantonnement may concern a specific asset, an undivided fraction, or “only a right in rem such as usufruct or bare ownership”. If the beneficiary may give up full ownership of an asset, they must at least be able to limit the legacy to bare ownership or to usufruct. The answers add that notarial practice may provide, in the legacy or in the gift between spouses, a clause authorising the beneficiary to change the nature of the right transferred by way of cantonnement (Ministerial answer no. 02761, JO Sénat 21 August 2025, p. 4601; Ministerial answer no. 2998, JOAN 26 August 2025, p. 7383, in French).
A ministerial answer does not bind the civil courts, and no Cour de cassation ruling on this point had been identified as at 5 November 2026. No provision makes the clause a condition of validity, but without it legal certainty remains open to debate: the firm recommends it.
The beneficiary is taxed, at their own rate, only on what they receive; the heirs are taxed on their share, including the assets given up, according to their relationship with the deceased (BOI-ENR-DMTG-10-20-50-30, § 20 and 30). The beneficiary’s own allowances remain intact.
Everything depends on who limits. A surviving spouse and a civil partner are exempt from inheritance tax (Tax Code, art. 796-0 bis): their cantonnement increases the children’s immediate tax but lightens their own future estate. A legatee unrelated to the deceased, other than a spouse or civil partner, is as a rule taxed at 60% (Tax Code, art. 777): their cantonnement may reduce the total burden where those who take the assets enjoy a more favourable rate or allowances, such as children in the direct line.
The abuse of law procedure remains available against a sham, or against a deed that seeks the benefit of a literal application of the law contrary to its authors’ objectives with the sole aim of avoiding tax (LPF, art. L. 64), with an 80% penalty, reduced to 40% for a taxpayer who neither took the main initiative nor was the main beneficiary (Tax Code, art. 1729, b). Giving up assets in return for a hidden consideration, such as a payment to the beneficiary or a promise to transfer the assets back, would be a disguised sale or gift, not a cantonnement.
A blended family. A husband dies leaving two children from a first marriage and a 72-year-old wife who benefits from a gift between spouses. The estate is worth €1,200,000: a home worth €600,000 and €600,000 of securities. At 72, usufruct is valued at 30% of full ownership (Tax Code, art. 669).
If the wife takes one quarter in full ownership and three quarters in usufruct, each child receives the bare ownership of €450,000, taxed on €315,000; after the €100,000 allowance (Tax Code, art. 779), each pays about €41,194. But €300,000 become the wife’s property and will pass to her own heirs; if she later left them to her stepchildren, who are unrelated for tax purposes, each would pay about €89,044.
If the gift expressly allows it and she limits her entitlement to the usufruct of the home, without claiming the balance of her statutory rights, each child immediately receives €300,000 of securities and the bare ownership of half the home. Each pays about €80,194, and the usufruct then ends on the wife’s death without any tax (Tax Code, art. 1133).
A legatee taxed at 60%. A father leaves one child and €1,000,000; he bequeaths the disposable portion, one half (Civil Code, art. 913), to his partner, who is neither his wife nor his civil partner. Without cantonnement, she pays about €299,044 (60% after the €1,594 allowance of article 788, IV) and the child about €78,194, a total of €377,238. If she limits her legacy to €200,000, she pays about €119,044 and the child, who receives €800,000, about €152,962: €272,006, a saving of more than €105,000 for the family.
Fictitious, rounded figures, at constant values, assuming allowances are unused.
A gift between spouses or a will is often drafted years before death, giving the maximum to cover any situation. On death, the beneficiary does not always need everything, or would rather the children receive at once a home they live in or a business they run.
Before 2007, the only options were to accept everything and then make a gift, at the cost of a second transfer, or to disclaim entirely. Since Law no. 2006-728 of 23 June 2006, the beneficiary may accept and limit the gift or legacy to part of the assets. The part given up passes to the other successors under the statutory or testamentary rules of devolution, as if it had never been bequeathed.
The survivor chooses; the deceased’s deed secures the choice.
Restating the right forestalls any argument about a contrary intention; a spouse who wants the other to take all or nothing may prohibit it.
Authorise cantonnement over the usufruct or the bare ownership of all or part of the assets, as suggested by the 2025 ministerial answers.
A few months after death, consistent with the inheritance tax return, and what happens if no choice is made.
It follows the rules of devolution. Accrual between joint legatees (Civil Code, art. 1044) does not expressly address a partial cantonnement: where there are several legatees, state whether the part given up goes to the co-legatees or to the heirs.
Where there is a child who is not the spouse’s, a spouse without a gift takes only one quarter in full ownership (art. 757). A gift between spouses covering the largest portion may allow the spouse to opt for usufruct, depending on its terms. Faced with a gift in full ownership made within the limits of article 1094-1, each child who is not the spouse’s may, unless the deceased unequivocally provided otherwise, substitute for it the surrender of the usufruct of the share they would have taken had there been no surviving spouse (art. 1098).
No. A disclaimer covers the whole entitlement; cantonnement presupposes acceptance of the gift or legacy, then limited to part of the assets.
No. The part given up follows the rules of devolution. To favour one child, you must accept and then make a gift, which is a gift by you, taxed as such.
Yes, as a legatee, if a statutory heir has accepted the estate (Civil Code, art. 1002-1). Article 1094-1 applies only to a married spouse.
In principle, a clearly expressed cantonnement cannot be withdrawn unilaterally: the Paris Court of Appeal held a wife’s option irrevocable and refused to let a later deed change its scope (1 October 2025, no. 23/12935). Its exact scope depends on the wording of the deed.
No: the assets given up are deemed transferred by the deceased (Tax Code, art. 788 bis). The notary charges a fee proportional to the amount given up (Commercial Code, art. A. 444-62).
Gifts, wills, forced heirship and inheritance tax.
Voir la page UsufructHow split ownership works and how it is valued.
Voir la page UsufructUsufruct over cash and the restitution claim.
Voir la page Life insuranceBeneficiary clause and tax on death.
Voir la page Tax auditProcedures and recent case law.
Voir la page
The information on this page is provided for documentary purposes and does not constitute legal or tax advice. The worked examples are fictitious. Law as at 5 November 2026.
No slot suits you? Describe your situation and the firm will call you back.