Banking & Finance — Real-estate taxation

The French 3% tax

A tax law firm in Paris, BENSAID Avocats advises funds, family offices, holding companies, trusts and foreign entities on the French 3% tax on the fair market value of real estate held in France (articles 990 D to 990 G of the French Tax Code): annual filing (form 2746), securing complex ownership chains, compliance with the June 2026 reform (end of the exemption by undertaking, representative in France), defence against reassessments and litigation before the competent courts.

Paris · Geneva · Marseille · Cannes · Lisbon

What is the French 3% tax, and what changes in 2027?

The French 3% tax (articles 990 D to 990 G of the French Tax Code) is charged each year on the fair market value as at 1 January of buildings located in France held, directly or through a chain of holdings, by legal entities: companies, funds, trusts and comparable institutions. It is payable by the entity closest to the buildings in the chain that is not exempt under point d or e of 3° of article 990 E, and is declared on form 2746-SD by 15 May at the latest.

Law no. 2026-534 of 25 June 2026 on combating social and tax fraud changed the regime from 27 June 2026. The exemption can no longer be obtained by a simple undertaking to disclose the shareholders to the tax authorities on request: only an actual annual return filed by 15 May now qualifies (article 990 E, 3°, d). Entities required to file that have no permanent establishment in France must also appoint a representative in France (new article 990 FA).

As the tax is due on the position at 1 January and the 15 May 2026 deadline had passed when the law came into force, in the absence of a transitional provision, and subject to administrative clarification, the new regime appears to apply for the first time at the 15 May 2027 deadline. Structures that relied on an undertaking must get organised before that date.

French Tax Code, art. 990 D, 990 E, 990 F, 990 FA and 990 G as amended by law no. 2026-534 of 25 June 2026. Checked on 12 October 2026.

— Before the courts

Before the courts: means of disclosure, the fiduciary and ownership chains

Until the law of 25 June 2026, point d of 3° of article 990 E gave exemption to an entity that supplied the information to the tax authorities each year, or that gave and honoured an undertaking to supply it on request. The Cour de cassation has held that these two means are mutually exclusive. The law replaced both with an annual return filed before 15 May; the judgment remains useful for pending reassessments on earlier years. Two further judgments of the commercial chamber, of 8 July and 28 May 2026, settle who can obtain the exemption by filing and on whom the tax authorities must serve their acts.

  • The undertaking and the annual return cannot be combined. A company governed by British law that owned a property in France had given in 2004 the undertaking to supply the information of article 990 E, 3°, d, then spontaneously sent annual returns no. 2746 for 2006 to 2012. The tax authorities had noted that those returns named individuals as shareholders whereas the company had been wholly owned by another foreign company since 2006. The Cour de cassation holds that, where such entities may choose between two means of supplying information in order to be exempt from the tax, those means are mutually exclusive: by sending its returns spontaneously, the company had allowed the tax authorities to serve a reassessment proposal validly without following the procedure of article R. 23 B-1 of the Tax Procedure Code, and the appeal is dismissed (Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, 1 April 2026, no. 25-10.605, published in the Bulletin; in French).
  • The fiduciary is not a shareholder within point e of 3° of article 990 E. A simplified joint-stock company owning a villa had filed, after a formal notice of 4 August 2015, the returns no. 2746 for 2009 to 2014, stating that its capital was held by an individual and, for some years, mentioning a "fiduciary holder". The Cour de cassation holds that the fiduciary, whose estate, for the purposes of the wealth tax rules, does not include the assets transferred to the fiducie, cannot be regarded as a shareholder under that provision (the judgment refers to "article 990, D, 3°, e)", an apparent slip for article 990 E). It sets aside the Aix-en-Provence appeal judgment, which had not examined whether those returns identified the shareholder sufficiently, nor whether the tax authorities had disregarded their own doctrine (BOI-PAT-TPC-30, para. 20) by demanding payment of the tax in the formal notice (Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, 8 July 2026, no. 25-12.737, published in the Bulletin; in French).
  • In an ownership chain, interposed entities are jointly liable, not legal taxpayers. A Luxembourg company held all the shares of a French property-owning SCI, and the tax authorities had sent the reassessment proposal and then the recovery notice for 2013 and 2014 to it alone. The court of appeal had held the procedure irregular for want of notification to the SCI. The Cour de cassation sets that aside: the tax authorities need not serve, as they are drawn up, the acts that follow the reassessment proposal on all the entities interposed between the taxpayers and the property, which are only jointly liable for payment and not legal taxpayers (Cour de cassation, commercial chamber, 28 May 2026, no. 24-18.404, Satofi, published in the Bulletin; in French).

For entities that had chosen the undertaking, the firm reviews the ownership chain and prepares the first complete return, naming the actual shareholders above 1%, before the 15 May 2027 deadline. For those facing a reassessment proposal on earlier years, it first checks which route the entity actually followed. The judgment of 28 May 2026 applied article 990 F as worded in 2008; the version in force since 27 June 2026 keeps the tax payable by the entity closest to the property and the joint liability of interposed entities, and article 990 FA now requires an entity subject to the reporting duty of articles 990 E and 990 F that has no permanent establishment in France to name, in its return, a recipient of notifications domiciled or established in France; failing that, the entity closest to the property or real-estate rights in the ownership chain known to the tax authorities, whether exempt or not, is deemed to receive them.

— Insurance and rulings

Tax risk insurance and tax rulings

Some brokers offer to insure the 3% tax risk when a structure holding real estate in France is acquired. Such a policy indemnifies, within its caps and exclusions, the consequences of a reassessment; it does not prevent it and does not bind the tax authorities. The general ruling under point 1° of article L. 80 B of the French Tax Procedure Code, which applies to taxes levied under the French Tax Code and therefore to the 3% tax (BOI-SJ-RES-10-20-10, para. 30), allows you instead to obtain a formal position binding on the tax authorities, for instance on the 50% test in point 2° of article 990 E. Only an express answer binds them; it is given in principle within three months of a written, precise and complete request.

Neither the policy nor the ruling releases you from filing obligations: those liable to the tax and entities exempt under points d or e of 3° of article 990 E file return no. 2746-SD by 15 May (articles 990 E and 990 F); since the law of 25 June 2026, an undertaking to disclose on request no longer suffices for point d. See our page French tax ruling or tax risk insurance.

— 01

Mastering the French 3% tax in complex ownership chains

The French 3% tax (articles 990 D to 990 G of the French Tax Code) is payable each year by legal entities, whether companies, funds, trusts or foundations, that hold directly or indirectly real estate or real-estate rights located in France, assessed on the fair market value of those assets as at 1 January. Its purpose is to counteract the opacity of cross-border ownership chains.

The exemptions are listed in article 990 E of the French Tax Code: international organisations and sovereign States (1°); entities whose French real estate represents less than 50% of their French assets (excluding property used for a non-real-estate business), or which are listed on a regulated market (2°); and, for entities with their seat in France, in the European Union, in a country or territory bound to France by an administrative assistance convention or in a State whose treaty gives them the same treatment as French entities (3°), those whose share in French real estate is below EUR 100,000 or 5% of its value, bodies set up to manage pension schemes, bodies recognised as of public utility or run on a non-profit basis whose activity or funding justifies owning the property, SPPICAVs and certain real-estate investment funds (or equivalent foreign vehicles), and entities that file a return each year showing their buildings and their shareholders holding more than 1% (point d requires the identity of all holders above 1%, point e that of the holders known to the entity, pro rata). Since the law of 25 June 2026, that last route requires an actual return filed by 15 May: the former undertaking to disclose on request is no longer enough.

The firm acts in structural advisory work, ownership-chain audits, compliance with the 2026 reform and litigation over reassessment notices, which become particularly complex where the ownership chain involves SCIs, EU or non-EU holding companies, trusts or private foundations. We are regularly instructed on these matters in connection with real-estate and wealth-structuring transactions.

— 02

Areas of practice

01

Ownership-chain audit

Mapping and qualifying the real-estate ownership chain for the purposes of the French 3% tax, for complex wealth-holding structures.

  • Identification of the entities falling within the scope of the tax (990 D of the French Tax Code).
  • Qualification of the main asset (real estate vs other), the key test for the 990 E 2° exemption.
  • Monitoring of thresholds and consolidation at each tier of the ownership chain.
  • Analysis of the tax residence of the entities and of the beneficial owners.
  • Recommendations for simplification or restructuring.
02

Exemptions & 2026 reform

Securing the benefit of the exemptions under the regime introduced by the law of 25 June 2026.

  • 990 E 1°: international organisations, sovereign States and the entities they control.
  • 990 E 2°: French real estate representing less than 50% of French assets, or securities listed on a regulated market (and wholly owned subsidiaries).
  • 990 E 3° (seat in France, in the EU, in a country or territory bound by an administrative assistance convention or in a State whose treaty gives the same treatment as French entities): share in French real estate below EUR 100,000 or 5% of its value, bodies set up to manage pension schemes, bodies recognised as of public utility or run on a non-profit basis whose activity or funding justifies owning the property, SPPICAVs and certain real-estate investment funds (or equivalent foreign vehicles), entities that file a return each year showing their buildings and their shareholders holding more than 1%.
  • End of the undertaking to disclose on request: the entities concerned must file an actual return by 15 May, from 2027.
  • Representative in France (article 990 FA) for entities required to file that have no permanent establishment in France; failing that, the entity closest to the buildings in the chain and known to the tax authorities is deemed to receive their communications.
  • Securing form 2746-SD and its schedules (full chain of shareholders).
03

Trusts & foreign fiduciary structures

Application of the French 3% tax to trusts and equivalent structures, a major point of vigilance.

  • Article 990 D: paragraph 1 subjects to the tax legal persons, bodies, fiducies and comparable institutions, a category to which a trust may belong depending on its characteristics; paragraph 2 defines holding through an interposed entity.
  • Interaction with the reporting obligations of article 1649 AB (2181-Trust forms).
  • Cases involving private trust companies, Stiftung foundations and anstalts.
  • Coordination with foreign advisers (Switzerland, Liechtenstein, United Kingdom, USA, Bahamas).
  • Forward-looking restructuring: termination of the trust, transparency towards the French tax authorities.
04

Litigation over the tax

Defence against reassessments, litigation over refused exemptions, actions for annulment.

  • Responses to reassessment proposals and adversarial observations.
  • Litigation before the civil court (which has jurisdiction over the French 3% tax as a registration duty).
  • Challenges based on tax treaties and European Union law (free movement of capital, article 63 TFEU).
  • Applications for discretionary relief or settlement.
  • Coordination with foreign counsel on the international aspects of the dispute.
05

Interaction with the IFI & gift and inheritance taxes

Coordinating the French 3% tax with the IFI (real-estate wealth tax) and gift and inheritance taxes for wealth-holding structures.

  • Interaction with the IFI (real-estate wealth tax) on shares in predominantly real-estate companies.
  • Consequences of the 2026 wealth-holding company tax: see our dedicated analysis.
  • Interaction with real-estate fiducie arrangements and holding transactions: see our page on fiducie and complex financing.
  • Consequences for inheritance tax and estate planning.
  • Wealth-simplification strategies.
06

Acquisitions & due diligence

French 3% tax due diligence prior to any acquisition of a French real-estate-owning entity or of shares in such an entity.

  • Verification of compliance with past filing obligations (forms 2746).
  • Quantification of the latent tax liability in respect of the tax and its penalties.
  • Contractual protections to be negotiated in the SPA (representations & warranties, indemnification).
  • Preparation of the first post-acquisition filing.
  • Coordination with VAT, transfer tax, corporate income tax and IFI due diligence.
— 04

Lead counsel — François Ouairy

Partner in charge of the Paris office, specialising in VAT, real-estate taxation and wealth taxation. Best Lawyers 2026 in Tax Law, Leaders League: Excellent in VAT (2026), Highly recommended in real estate tax (2026). François Ouairy regularly acts in litigation over the French 3% tax, which is particularly complex for hybrid chains (EU and non-EU holding companies, trusts, foundations), and in wealth-simplification transactions designed to secure the applicable regime. He works alongside Jonathan Bensaid on the wealth and fiducie aspects.

  • Best Lawyers 2026 — Tax Law
  • Leaders League, Real estate tax: Highly recommended (2026)
  • Leaders League, VAT: Excellent (2026)
  • French Tax Code art. 990 D to 990 G
  • Form 2746
  • Trusts & hybrid chains
  • Litigation before civil courts and Cour de cassation
— 03

Recent publications

A selection of the firm's articles on real-estate taxation, wealth-holding companies and the transparency of ownership chains.

Foreign companies · 2026

Foreign company in France: subsidiary, branch or permanent establishment

The firm's entry page for foreign companies: set-up, corporate tax, withholding taxes, VAT, the 3% tax and IFI.

October 2026 Lire l'article
Holding · 2026

The 2026 wealth-holding company tax

Overview and practical consequences of the new tax on wealth-holding companies, and its interaction with the French 3% tax.

March 2026 Lire l'article
VAT · Para-hotel services

VAT and furnished rentals: the Conseil d'État ruling of 12 November 2025

A major decision clarifying the para-hotel regime, with consequences for wealth-holding structures owned by non-residents.

November 2025 Lire l'article
Property dealers

Notary fees for property dealers

Interaction between the resale undertaking and the building undertaking in real-estate structuring transactions.

August 2024 Lire l'article
Estates · International

International successions and non-resident taxation

Interaction of civil and tax rules for international ownership chains holding French real estate.

September 2016 Lire l'article
Foreign accounts

Foreign bank accounts: obligations and penalties

Reporting obligations applicable to structures holding French real estate, and the convergence of CRS and DAC8.

March 2026 Lire l'article
Listed property · SIIC

SIIC: deferred interest and the EUR 3M threshold

How the mechanism applies to listed property companies, and its interaction with the exemption for listed entities under the French 3% tax.

August 2025 Lire l'article
— 05

Frequently asked questions

What is the French 3% tax?

The French 3% tax (articles 990 D to 990 G of the French Tax Code) is an annual French tax charged on the fair market value, as at 1 January, of real estate or real-estate rights located in France and held, directly or indirectly, by legal entities (companies, funds, trusts, foundations). Its purpose is to counteract the opacity of cross-border ownership chains by imposing a recurring cost on foreign entities that do not disclose their shareholder base.

Who is liable for the French 3% tax?

All legal entities, whether French or foreign, that hold French real estate directly or through intermediaries are liable: companies (SCIs, SAS, foreign companies), funds (FCPI, FPCI, foreign funds), trusts (article 990 D para. 2 of the French Tax Code), private foundations, Stiftung entities and anstalts. Where there is a chain of holdings, the tax is payable by the entity or entities closest to the buildings that are not exempt under point d or e of 3° of article 990 E (article 990 F), and every entity interposed between them and the buildings is jointly liable for payment.

What are the main exemptions?

Article 990 E of the French Tax Code provides for three series: (1°) international organisations, sovereign States and the entities they control; (2°) entities whose French real estate represents less than 50% of their French assets (excluding property used for a non-real-estate business), or whose securities are listed on a regulated market; (3°) for entities with their seat in France, in the European Union, in a country or territory bound to France by an administrative assistance convention or in a State whose treaty gives them the same treatment as French entities: share in French real estate below EUR 100,000 or 5% of its value, bodies set up to manage pension schemes, bodies recognised as of public utility or run on a non-profit basis whose activity or funding justifies owning the property, SPPICAVs and certain real-estate investment funds (or equivalent foreign vehicles), and entities that file a return each year by 15 May showing their buildings and their shareholders holding more than 1% (point d requires the identity of all holders above 1%, point e that of the holders known to the entity, pro rata). Since the law of 25 June 2026, an undertaking to disclose that information on request is no longer enough.

What does the law of 25 June 2026 change for the French 3% tax?

Law no. 2026-534 on combating social and tax fraud removes the exemption obtained by an undertaking to disclose the shareholders to the tax authorities on request: the exemption now requires an actual annual return filed by 15 May. It also requires entities that must file and have no permanent establishment in France to appoint a representative in that return (article 990 FA); failing that, the entity closest to the buildings in the chain and known to the tax authorities, even if exempt, is deemed to receive the tax authorities' communications. In the absence of a transitional provision, and subject to administrative clarification, the new regime appears to apply for the first time at the 15 May 2027 deadline.

Can an annual return and an undertaking to disclose be combined for the French 3% tax?

No. On 1 April 2026 (no. 25-10.605) the Cour de cassation held that the two means of supplying information in article 990 E, 3°, d, the annual return and the undertaking to disclose on request, are mutually exclusive: an entity that spontaneously sends annual returns can no longer rely on the procedural safeguards attached to the undertaking. Since the law of 25 June 2026, only the annual return remains.

What is form 2746?

Form 2746-SD is the annual return for the French 3% tax. It must be filed each year by 15 May at the latest, together with payment, at the office designated under article 121 K ter of Annex IV to the French Tax Code: the tax office of the principal establishment for entities seated or established in France; for other entities, the office competent for their other reporting obligations (taxes other than local taxes) or, failing that, the foreign companies tax office (SIEE) of the non-residents tax directorate (DINR). It is filed by the taxpayers and, since the law of 25 June 2026, by every entity claiming the declarative exemption of article 990 E, 3°, d or e: the undertaking to disclose on request no longer exists. Entities without a permanent establishment in France name in it a recipient of notifications domiciled or established in France (article 990 FA). Failure to file means loss of the exemption and assessment of the tax.

Is a trust liable for the French 3% tax?

It may be. Article 990 D covers fiducies and "comparable institutions", a category to which a trust may belong depending on its characteristics. A trust that falls within article 990 D can invoke 3° of article 990 E only if it meets the seat condition of that provision; it must then satisfy the requirements of point d or e to be exempt: it then files a return each year by 15 May showing its buildings and its members above 1%; since the law of 25 June 2026 a mere undertaking is no longer enough. Failing that, the French 3% tax is due. Coordination with the reporting obligations of article 1649 AB of the French Tax Code (2181-Trust returns) is essential, as is coordination with administrative assistance agreements.

How does litigation over the French 3% tax proceed?

Jurisdiction lies with the civil court (the tax is treated as a registration duty). The taxpayer first files a preliminary claim with the tax authorities, then issues a summons before the civil court if the claim is rejected. Disputes frequently concern (i) compliance with the conditions of the declarative exemption of article 990 E, 3°, (ii) the qualification of the main asset under the asset test, and (iii) compliance with European Union law (free movement of capital). Appeals may reach the Cour de cassation, and even the CJEU.

How can the acquisition of an SCI held by a foreign holding company be secured?

The due diligence should cover (i) compliance with past filing obligations by all entities in the chain, (ii) the quantification of the latent tax liability (tax plus interest plus fines), and (iii) the negotiation of protections in the SPA (representations & warranties, indemnity mechanism). After completion, a simplification of the chain and the setting up of annual returns should be considered to limit the recurring risk.

Can the French 3% tax apply on top of the IFI?

Yes, because their scope differs. The French 3% tax is payable by the legal entity on the fair market value of French real estate as at 1 January. The IFI (real-estate wealth tax) is payable by individuals on the net value of their real-estate wealth (held directly or through predominantly real-estate companies). The two taxes can therefore apply cumulatively in a chain where the legal entity pays the French 3% tax and the individual shareholders are liable for the IFI on the value of their shares.

Cité par

An ownership chain to secure or a reassessment to challenge?

A confidential initial discussion, with no obligation. We reply within 24 business hours.